At a time when the financial crsis is taking the DOW below 8000pts and the world economy is starting to feel some of the repercussions, a high profile security breach is being reported. The World Bank has been under siege for at least a year and more information and details regarding the intrusions was published today by Fox News.
The first breach of the bank's secrets was discovered in September, 2007, after the FBI .while at work on a different cybercrime case . notified the bank that something was wrong. The feds pointed to a part of the bank's network that led out of the Johannesburg hub of the International Finance Corp. (IFC), a bank arm that lends to the private sector.
The second major breach . of the bank's treasury network in Washington . was discovered in April 2008. The World Bank's Treasury manages $70 billion in assets for 25 clients . including the central banks of some countries. It carries out substantial collaborations with the world's finance ministers on public wealth and debt management, runs an active bond-trading desk in Washington, and does everything from currency trading to capital markets financings.
What really makes this particular breach interesting (besides the target) is that at least one portion of the intrusion was allegedly sourced from one of the largest outsourcing firms in India. Why does the government and major financial institutions insist on the outsourcing model when it is readily apparent that the security of these organizations just isn't there. To really bring this home, how much of our software development has companies like Cisco, Microsoft, and even security vendors like Symantec outsourced to India. Obviously any is too much. If we really must continue to outsource overseas there really needs to be a requirement for independent security assessment of all outsourced development. *GASP* who would have thunk it.
NOTE: Fixed broken link. Thanks Scott.

